Investing in the Future: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mentorship Networks for Residents

  • Omar Farooq Khan University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-5360
  • Alison Walzak University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine
  • Rahim Kachra University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine
  • Theresa J.B. Kline University of Calgary
  • Fiona M. Clement University of Calgary
  • Hude Quan University of Calgary
  • Aleem M. Bharwani University of Calgary
Keywords: Mentoring, Internship and Residency, Models, Educational, Organizational.

Abstract

Background: Formal mentorship plays a key career development role in medicine. Traditional mentorship consists of dyadic relationships between mentors and their mentees. However, research favours utilization of mentorship networks involving individuals at multiple levels.

Objective: This study aimed to rigorously evaluate a formalized mentorship network program within a Canadian Internal Medicine residency program from 2012 to 2013.

Methods: Residents participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews at baseline and after one year of participation in the mentorship network. Closed-ended surveys assessed affective organizational commitment, self-efficacy, career satisfaction and overall wellness among residents and faculty members. 89 residents and 28 faculty members were invited to participate; 40 residents and 18 faculty members completed the survey after one year.

Results: Residents perceived mentorship networks to add value across multiple domains, including self-awareness, overall efficiency, and physician wellness. Satisfaction with the program was very high, with 98% (n = 39/40) of residents and 89% of faculty members (n = 16/18) wanting the program to continue after year one. Male mentors were more likely to report benefits from serving as a mentor than their female counterparts. In contrast to this, female mentees found mentorship more useful than male mentees.

Conclusions: Network mentorship is associated with personal and system benefits, though these benefits are difficult to quantify. The network model is feasible and well-received by mentors and mentees. Further research considering both short- and long-term endpoints is required to delineate the true cost-benefit ratio of mentorship programs to both mentors and mentees.

Author Biographies

Omar Farooq Khan, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine

Resident Physician (Medical Oncology), Department of Oncology

Alison Walzak, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine
Rahim Kachra, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine
Theresa J.B. Kline, University of Calgary
Professor Emeritus, Department of Psychology
Fiona M. Clement, University of Calgary
Associate Professor, Department of Community Health Sciences; Director of the Health Technology Assessment Unit, University of Calgary
Hude Quan, University of Calgary
Professor, Department of Community Health and Sciences
Aleem M. Bharwani, University of Calgary
Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine

References

Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. Mentoring in academic medicine: A systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1103-1115.

Ramanan RA, Taylor WC, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Mentoring matters. mentoring and career preparation in internal medicine residency training. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):340-345.

Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. The impact of mentoring during postgraduate training on doctors' career success. Med Educ. 2011;45(5):488-496.

Frei E, Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Mentoring programs for medical students--a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:32-6920-10-32.

DeCastro R, Sambuco D, Ubel PA, Stewart A, Jagsi R. Mentor networks in academic medicine: Moving beyond a dyadic conception of mentoring for junior faculty researchers. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):488-496.

Steven A, Oxley J, Fleming WG. Mentoring for NHS doctors: Perceived benefits across the personal-professional interface. J R Soc Med. 2008;101(11):552-557.

Taherian K, Shekarchian M. Mentoring for doctors. do its benefits outweigh its disadvantages? Med Teach. 2008;30(4):e95-9.

Allen TD, O'Brien KE. Formal mentoring programs and organizational attraction. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2006;17(1):43-58.

Wilson JA, Elman NS. Organizational benefits of mentoring. The Executive. 1990;4(4):88.

Ehrich LC, Hansford B, Tennent L. Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly. 2004;40(4):518-540.

Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor-mentee relationship in academic medicine: A qualitative study. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):135-139.

Higgins MC, Kram KE. Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management.The Academy of Management Review. 2001;26(2):264-288.

Levine RB, Mechaber HF, Reddy ST, Cayea D, Harrison RA. "A good career choice for women": Female medical students' mentoring experiences: A multi-institutional qualitative study. Acad Med. 2013;88(4):527-534.

Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, Thanh NX, Jacobs P. How does burnout affect physician productivity? A systematic literature review. BMC health services research. 2014;14(1):1.

Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, et al. Burnout among U.S. medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general U.S. population. Acad Med. 2014;89(3):443-451.

Shanafelt TD, Mungo M, Schmitgen J, et al. Longitudinal study evaluating the association between physician burnout and changes in professional work effort. . 2016;91(4):422-431.

Lounsbury JW, Park S, Sundstrom E, Williamson JM, Pemberton AE. Personality, career satisfaction, and life satisfaction: Test of a directional model. Journal of Career Assessment. 2004;12(4):395-406.

Meyer JP, Allen NJ, Smith CA. Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(4):538-551.

Scholz U, Dona BG, Sud S, Schwarzer R. Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? *: Psychometric findings from 25 countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2002(Special Section on Program Evaluation 18(3)):242-251.

Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human resource management review. 1991;1(1):61-89.

Haji F, Morin M, Parker K. Rethinking programme evaluation in health professions education: Beyond ‘did it work?’. Med Educ. 2013;47(4):342-351.

Schloss EP, Flanagan DM, Culler CL, Wright AL. Some hidden costs of faculty turnover in clinical departments in one academic medical center. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):32-36.

Waldman JD, Kelly F, Arora S, Smith HL. The shocking cost of turnover in health care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2004;29(1):2-7.

O'Brien KE, Biga A, Kessler SR, Allen TD. A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring. Journal of Management. 2010;36(2):537-554.

Ragins BR. Barriers to mentoring: The female manager's dilemma. Human relations. 1989;42(1):1-22.

Ragins BR, Cotton JL. Easier said than done: Gender differences in perceived barriers to gaining a mentor. Academy of Management Journal. 1991;34(4):939-951.

Ragins BR, Cotton JL. Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations. Journal of Management. 1993;19(1):97-111.

Ragins BR, Scandura TA. Burden or blessing? expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. J Organ Behav. 1999;20(4):493-509.

Strong EA, De Castro R, Sambuco D, et al. Work–Life balance in academic medicine: Narratives of physician-researchers and their mentors. Journal of general internal medicine. 2013;28(12):1596-1603.

Molina JA, Gimenez-Nadal JI, Cuesta JA, Gracia-Lazaro C, Moreno Y, Sanchez A. Gender differences in cooperation: Experimental evidence on high school students. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83700.

Stump GS, Hilpert JC, Husman J, Chung W, Kim W. Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement. J Eng Educ. 2011;100(3):475-497.

Philbin M, Meier E, Huffman S, Boverie P. A survey of gender and learning styles. Sex Roles. 1995;32(7-8):485-494.

Yarbrough DB, Shulha LM, Hopson RK, Caruthers FA. The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users. Sage Publications; 2010.

Published
2018-06-25
How to Cite
Khan, O., Walzak, A., Kachra, R., Kline, T., Clement, F., Quan, H., & Bharwani, A. (2018). Investing in the Future: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mentorship Networks for Residents. Canadian Journal of General Internal Medicine, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.22374/cjgim.v13i2.228
Section
Teaching and Learning