Education Research Productivity of Academic Physicians

Main Article Content

Liam Rourke PhD
Dale Storie MA MLIS

medical education research

Abstract

For several decades, organizations such as the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada have encouraged academic physicians to engage in medical education research. The extent to which these efforts have been persuasive is unclear. This article discusses a study whose purpose was to describe changes in the educational research productivity within this group from 1997 to 2010. The authors found that there has been a substantial increase in the publishing reports of medical education research by Canadian academic physicians.
Abstract 286 | PDF Downloads 169 HTML Downloads 176

References

1. Canadian Association for Medical Education Advancement of Educational Scholarship Working Group. Think tank. Ottawa (ON): The Association, 2012; http://www.came-acem.ca/docs/thinktank/CAME_AES_WG_ Summary_Think_Tank_Final.pdf.

2. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Medical education research grant. Ottawa (ON): The College, 2012; http://www.royalcollege.ca/portal/page/portal/rc/awards/ grants/meded_research_grant.

3. Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical education scholarship research and evaluation. Washington (DC): The Association, 2012; https://www.aamc.org/members/gea/gea_sections/mesre/.

4. Office of Research and Information Services, Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. Faculty members in Canadian Faculties of Medicine by rank and department. Ottawa (ON): The Office, 2011; http://www.afmc.ca/pdf/2009-10%20Fields.pdf.

5. Albanese M, Horowitz S, Moss R, Farrell P. An institutionally funded program for educational research and development grants: it makes dollars and sense. Acad Med 1998;73(7):756–61.

6. Beckman T. Experience with a medical education research group at the Mayo Clinic. Med Teach 2009;31(6):518–21.

7. Frohna AZ, Hamstra SJ, Mullan PB, Gruppen LD. Teaching medical education principles and methods to faculty using an active learning approach: the University of Michigan Medical Education Scholars Program. Acad Med 2006;81(11):975–8.

8. Goldszmidt M, Zibrowski E, Watling C. Fostering education scholarship: the mentored research group. Med Educ 2009;43(11):1084–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03497.x.

9. Gruppen L. Creating and sustaining centres for medical education research and development. Acad Med 2008;42(2):121–3.

10. Steinert Y, McLeod P, Liben S, Snell L. Writing for publication in medical education: the benefits of a faculty development workshop and peer writing group. Med Teach 2008;30(8):e280–5.

11. Dyrbye L, Lindor K, LaRusso N, Cook D. Research productivity of graduates from 3 physician-scientist training programs. Am J Med 2008;121(12):1107–13.

12. Mahoney M, Verma P, Morantz S. Research productivity among recipients of AAFP foundation grants. Ann Fam Med 2007;5(2):143–5.

13. Brocato J, Mavis B. The research productivity of faculty in family medicine departments at U.S. medical schools: a national study. Acad Med 2005;80(3):244–52.

14. Ferrer R, Katerndahl D. Predictors of short-term and long-term scholarly activity by academic faculty: a departmental case study. Fam Med 2002;34(6):455–61.

15. Eschelman D, Sullivan K, Parker L, Levin D. The relationship of clinical and academic productivity in a university hospital radiology department. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174(1):27–31.

16. Kearney R, Lee S, Skakun E, Tyrrell D. The research productivity of Canadian physicians: how the timing of obtaining a PhD has an influence. Acad Med 2007;82(3):310–5.

17. Chung S, Clifton J, Rowe A, Finley R, Warnock G. Strategic faculty recruitment increases research productivity within an academic university division. Can J Surg 2009;52(5):401–6.

18. van Raan A. Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2005;62(1):133–43.